Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Illinois Federalists.
I hate Illinois Federalists.
Damn your inalienable, God-given, natural right to life and liberty. We got teh federalism to uphold! (That's the Chicago Way.)
Ok... anyone who can write that crap with a straight face has spent entirely too long in law school.
Not only that, but they have their heads up their asses and don't know history.
Splash, out
Jason
Illinois has not abolished self-defense and has not expressed a preference for long guns over handguns. But the municipalities can, and do, stress another of the themes in the debate over incorporation of the Bill of Rights: That the Constitution establishes a federal republic where local differences are to be cherished as elements of liberty rather than extirpated in order to produce a single, nationally applicable rule.
Damn your inalienable, God-given, natural right to life and liberty. We got teh federalism to uphold! (That's the Chicago Way.)
Federalism is an older and more deeply rooted tradition than is a right to carry any particular kind of weapon.
Ok... anyone who can write that crap with a straight face has spent entirely too long in law school.
Not only that, but they have their heads up their asses and don't know history.
Splash, out
Jason
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Cedarford? Is That You?
Wow. Thank God we blocked this SOB, huh?
It's the Jews.
Yes. And "those who devoted themselves to sustaining it? **whisper** those would be the Jews.
"Powerful lobby." Jews. 'Nuff said.
Did I mention they drink the blood of Christian babies in their Passover rituals?
They also won't let me wear white after Rosh Hoshanah.
Did I mention the Jooos?
They are a cancer which must be eradicated. Joooooooooos!
JOOOOOOOOOOOOOS!!!!! Sehen Sie die Juden?
Honestly... the Obamatards were seriously considering this idiot? He's not even subtle. I can't believe this jerk even thought this was a remotely acceptable public statement. It reads like the work of a sociopath. I've known guys like this. They speak in code all the time... looking for people who will speak the same code back to them. Apparently, the Obamatards like what they hear.
We narrowly avoided this poisonous cur.
Splash, out
Jason
I do not believe the National Intelligence Council could function effectively while its chair was under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to the views of a political faction in a foreign country.
It's the Jews.
Still, I am saddened by what the controversy and the manner in which the public vitriol of those who devoted themselves to sustaining it have revealed about the state of our civil society.
Yes. And "those who devoted themselves to sustaining it? **whisper** those would be the Jews.
The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired,
"Powerful lobby." Jews. 'Nuff said.
The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth.
Did I mention they drink the blood of Christian babies in their Passover rituals?
The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors.
They also won't let me wear white after Rosh Hoshanah.
There is a special irony in having been accused of improper regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies by a group so clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government – in this case, the government of Israel.
Did I mention the Jooos?
I believe that the inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for US policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for anyone in the United States to say so. This is not just a tragedy for Israelis and their neighbors in the Middle East; it is doing widening damage to the national security of the United States.
They are a cancer which must be eradicated. Joooooooooos!
The outrageous agitation that followed the leak of my pending appointment will be seen by many to raise serious questions about whether the Obama administration will be able to make its own decisions about the Middle East and related issues. I regret that my willingness to serve the new administration has ended by casting doubt on its ability to consider, let alone decide what policies might best serve the interests of the United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing the will and interests of a foreign government.
JOOOOOOOOOOOOOS!!!!! Sehen Sie die Juden?
Honestly... the Obamatards were seriously considering this idiot? He's not even subtle. I can't believe this jerk even thought this was a remotely acceptable public statement. It reads like the work of a sociopath. I've known guys like this. They speak in code all the time... looking for people who will speak the same code back to them. Apparently, the Obamatards like what they hear.
We narrowly avoided this poisonous cur.
Splash, out
Jason
Labels: Althouse, Humor, Intelligence, Judaism, Obama, Politics
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Those farging iceholes!
Friday, September 05, 2008
Criminal Prosecution of Bush Administration Officials
Firedoglake's Jane Hamsher, the libtard responsible for putting a photoshop of Joe Lieberman in blackface during the 2006 Senate race in Connecticut, has a chat on Bloggingheads with Ann Althouse.
At issue: Should an Obama administration pursue criminal investigations against Bush Administration officials, including Bush and Cheney personally, for crimes allegedly committed while in office.
I was struck by Hamsher's presentation. She appears quite reasonable through most of the dialogue. But when Althouse draws her out on this topic, out comes The Beast.
Hamsher argues that Bush lied in order to get us into a war, and 4,000 soldiers are dead. "That's murder!" she exclaims. And she states that she and her readers will be "out there with torches and pitchforks" to ensure that Bush officials are prosecuted.
Her argument relies on the founding fathers and the Constitution, and she argues that it would set a bad precedent NOT to criminally prosecute Bush officials. Good liberal she is, she states "If Bush has not committed a crime, then he has nothing to fear."
That's right. Scratch a liberal, you'll find a fascist right under the skin.
At any rate, when she mentions the founding fathers, she is evincing a grasp of American history that only a cinematography school could let anyone get away with.
The reason our Republic survived, and France went through several republics, is because the Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians, by and large, settled their differences through elections (Aaron Burr notwithstanding) and not by trying to throw their predecessors in jail.
Had they instead followed Hamsher's advice, the two sides would have become armed camps nearly immediately, and the American democratic experiment would have been strangled in the cradle by Hamsher and her Committees of Public Safety.
Althouse is right: this notion that each succeeding administration should spend time prosecuting the one before it over what are essentially political disagreements is pure poison. It is a dagger pointed straight at the heart of our democracy. (Hamsher, you moron - you can make a better case prosecuting single mothers who have an abortion or their doctors for murder than you can making murder charges stick against Bush for ordering the invasion of Iraq.)
If Hamsher gets her way, then every succeeding administration will 1.) not be able to fill its slots with quality people, because service to the government will then become a legal liability, and 2.) have EVERY incentive to cheat, lie and steal during the following election, since everyone in it will have a personal stake.
If you have an impeachment case, bring it. If not, then try to win the next election.
Hamsher: A pretty face, but an idealistic twit.
Splash, out
Jason
ADDED: It's too bad that the Democratic Vice Presidential nominee is such a blowhard that he can say there will be criminal investigations of Bush officials under an Obama administration, and we can't be sure whether he meant it.
At issue: Should an Obama administration pursue criminal investigations against Bush Administration officials, including Bush and Cheney personally, for crimes allegedly committed while in office.
I was struck by Hamsher's presentation. She appears quite reasonable through most of the dialogue. But when Althouse draws her out on this topic, out comes The Beast.
Hamsher argues that Bush lied in order to get us into a war, and 4,000 soldiers are dead. "That's murder!" she exclaims. And she states that she and her readers will be "out there with torches and pitchforks" to ensure that Bush officials are prosecuted.
Her argument relies on the founding fathers and the Constitution, and she argues that it would set a bad precedent NOT to criminally prosecute Bush officials. Good liberal she is, she states "If Bush has not committed a crime, then he has nothing to fear."
That's right. Scratch a liberal, you'll find a fascist right under the skin.
At any rate, when she mentions the founding fathers, she is evincing a grasp of American history that only a cinematography school could let anyone get away with.
The reason our Republic survived, and France went through several republics, is because the Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians, by and large, settled their differences through elections (Aaron Burr notwithstanding) and not by trying to throw their predecessors in jail.
Had they instead followed Hamsher's advice, the two sides would have become armed camps nearly immediately, and the American democratic experiment would have been strangled in the cradle by Hamsher and her Committees of Public Safety.
Althouse is right: this notion that each succeeding administration should spend time prosecuting the one before it over what are essentially political disagreements is pure poison. It is a dagger pointed straight at the heart of our democracy. (Hamsher, you moron - you can make a better case prosecuting single mothers who have an abortion or their doctors for murder than you can making murder charges stick against Bush for ordering the invasion of Iraq.)
If Hamsher gets her way, then every succeeding administration will 1.) not be able to fill its slots with quality people, because service to the government will then become a legal liability, and 2.) have EVERY incentive to cheat, lie and steal during the following election, since everyone in it will have a personal stake.
If you have an impeachment case, bring it. If not, then try to win the next election.
Hamsher: A pretty face, but an idealistic twit.
Splash, out
Jason
ADDED: It's too bad that the Democratic Vice Presidential nominee is such a blowhard that he can say there will be criminal investigations of Bush officials under an Obama administration, and we can't be sure whether he meant it.
Labels: Althouse, Crime, Hamsher, Politics
