Saturday, January 13, 2007
Engaged in battle at Press Think
Once again.
At issue: Well, Rosens' opening post is - well - rather incoherent. Not sure what to make of it, other than an exercise in nonlinear reasoning and conclusions enencumbered by any factual foundation.
What's happening here, once again, is I'm taking issue with a series of the underlying postulates underlying their position, and trying to bring the debate back to the facts on the ground - both as we understood them in 2003 and as we know know them to be today.
The reaction is juvenile as usual, but entertaining if you like that sort of thing.
Why engage there?
Because much of Rosen's audience consists of opinion makers - journos themselves - and only a small minority post there.
Splash, out
Jason
At issue: Well, Rosens' opening post is - well - rather incoherent. Not sure what to make of it, other than an exercise in nonlinear reasoning and conclusions enencumbered by any factual foundation.
What's happening here, once again, is I'm taking issue with a series of the underlying postulates underlying their position, and trying to bring the debate back to the facts on the ground - both as we understood them in 2003 and as we know know them to be today.
The reaction is juvenile as usual, but entertaining if you like that sort of thing.
Why engage there?
Because much of Rosen's audience consists of opinion makers - journos themselves - and only a small minority post there.
Splash, out
Jason
Comments:
Post a Comment
