<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Daniel Glick still claims "it's not about logistics" 
And responds to my arguments - and those of several logistics pros here:

http://www.danielglick.com/wp/index.php?p=563

Not surprisingly, since Glick's out of his league, his response fails.



Well, I go off to Seattle for a couple of days, and look what happens. The only time this sleepy little blog gets any traffic is when I say something that provokes a conservative pile-on. This time, it was Jason van Steenwyk, whom I criticized in my last post.


Well, I hate to burst his "poor me" victim bubble, but one blogger responding to criticisms does not a "conservative pile on" make. Nor does calling me conservative in ANY way refute my substantive points, nor those of any of several loggie pros, some of whom have first hand knowledge of the Katrina-related operations.

In fact, at no time does Glick even attempt to address their points directly, nor does he make any attempt to challenge any specific substansive point I've made in any of several posts here dealing with hurricane logistics.

Here he is, though asserting, well, nothing in particular:

However, the military specializes in doing things that would seem impossibly complex to the untrained.


In other words, a bunch of professional military officers - loggies all - slap him around and tell him what he wants to do is logistically impossible, and his response is that the military specializes in doing the impossible. No, it doesn't. Military loggies especially specialize in doing the POSSIBLE, and not trying to do what's clearly impossible, nor promising the impossible.

When they do, the results are disastrous. Ask anyone in Army Group B under General von Paulus in Stalingrad. When the army was cut off by a Russian pincer movement, von Paulus quite rightly sought to attack to the west to cut his way back to his logistical base.

Field Marshall Goering, head of the German Luftwaffe, assured Hitler that he would be able to keep von Paulus supplied by air.

Goering was out of his league, too. He had no idea what it would take to keep a motorized army group supplied in combat operations. And as it turned out, the Luftwaffe did not have sufficient transport aircraft in the inventory to supply half of von Paulus's needs. And the airfields available - like the airfields and available, intact road networks around New Orleans, had only limited throughput capacity. So even unlimited transport capacity would have been insufficient.

As a result, Army Group B slowly began to eat itself. And the process deteriorated until Army Group B could not even send trucks to pick up supplies from its last remaining airfield, because they didn't have enough fuel to go pick up more fuel. Read "Enemy at the Gates" for a vivid oral history of the battle (the movie sucks, despite Rachel Weisz being hot.)

It was all about the logistics. And in the case of New Orleans in the early days of the disaster, it was specifically about throughput.



Logistics imposed a limit on what the armed forces could do. But because politics imposed an even greater limit, the actual delay was not about the logistics.



Glick evinces no evidence that he's absorbed what we are trying to tell him. He presents no evidence to support the idea that an earlier green light could have more than marginally improved ground-based federal response - and totally ignores the large scale Coast Guard and USN presence that was already on the scene rescuing people by the hundreds well within the first five days.

The rest of the military was actively engaged in contingency planning, even without an official warning order from the Pentagon. But guess what, kiddo - it takes more than two days to get a brigade ready to move.

Glick's final point goes back to his first point in his earlier post - and relies on a politely worded ad hominem:



As for Lieutenant van Steenwyk, I am sure that his service in the Guard has been more difficult and consequential than anything I have ever done or will do in my life. He has my respect and gratitude for that. But it does not make him a reliable expert on all things military, especially when his partisan bias is so evident.



Sure, I'm usually conservative. But where is Glick's evidence that my partisan bias is distorting my argument? Am I commenting on all things military? No. Do I claim expertise on submarine tactics from the 1950s? No. I'm commenting on what it takes to move a battalion task force's worth of vehicles and gear during and immediately after hurricane conditions. And Mr. Glick, if you have reason to believe I'm not credible on this particular subject, then spell it out. It's easy enough. Find someone who's got more experience in hurricane relief than I have, whose commanded or been an S4 or XO at a higher echelon than I have, who will argue differently, or who will tell you it's "Not about the logistics."

It's frustrating to see these people resort to ad hominems. Oh, Van Steenwyk's only a junior officer. Oh, Van Steenwyk's politically biased. Ad hominems do not advance an argument, nor do they invalidated someone else's. If I'm lying because I'm biased, or if I'm distorting things because I'm biased, then fine. Maybe I am. So point it out. What, specifically, am I distorting, or omitting, or lying about, that would have sped up the arrival of large federal troops by as much as a single day?

Splash, out

Jason

Comments:
And 'sunk and I have your back on that 1950s ASW thing.
 
Oh, I'm not frustrated in the sense that I take it personally. I'm just frustrated because people on the other side of the argument are just not grounding the discussion in the facts.
 
Get 1000s of Links pointing back to Your Site... Starting Today!
 
to all of the major RSS feed directories on the Internet.
 
a lot of premium products and services being offered for free. What’s best is that there is a seemingly
 
Imagine the power of tens of thousands of other web sites being able to easily
 
if u want an ipod, you can go to www.getipodsforfree.com and do an offer. follow the instructions and they'll actually send you a freeipod, no joke, there's reviews all over the internet
 
Search engine optimization, submission and highly-targeted traffic can be found exclusively at www.TheOnlinePromoters.com
 
Good post
 
Hi there...nice blog. When I was out blog surfing looking for detailed info on san francisco dating I found your page. Your site is not an exact match but it did catch my interest. Should you ever need information on san francisco dating then drop by the site above and check it out.
 
Hi Guys,

consumer electronics store : i get my lastest electronics news on consumer electronics store
Daily updated site with rss feed.
Anyone knows a better one ?
Thanks

Gregy
 
Hello,

News i found this morning :

Security breach involving undisclosed company prompts Bank of America to cancel debit cards of numerous customers.

Chris
 
Hello,

I went to blogger and searched for free electronics and got your blog.
Not really targeted the results !!
Anyone knows where to find blogs on free electronics ?
Thanks

Alex
 
consumer electronics sales : i find hard to find interesting sites on this topic
I came here to ask you guys if you know some sites where i can have info on consumer electronics sales
Let me know
Thanks
Ulrich
 
dating these days can be tricky, but it need not be, it's just a matter of embracing the new technology, going about things in a different way black dating
 
Interesting blog...
Searching for traffic site
http://www.1st-choice-4-website-traffic.com
traffic site
 
Just a few words about something related to photos. You may not believe but I meet someone special in online dating service with picture personals at http://top-personals.net. Check it if you're looking for swinger couple and fun. Online Personals Adult Singles
 

christian dating 101 Ways to Build Happy, Lasting Relationships.

Multilingual : English - Chinese Simplified - Chinese Traditional - Dutch - French - German - Greek - Italian - Japanese - Korean - Portuguese - Russian - Spanish

Start Over : When couples first get together, everything is new and exciting.

Lighten Up : Often when couples have gone through or are going through some bumpy spots in their relationship, things tend to get serious.

Night of Passion : Intimacy and passion in relationships is not only important but also healthy.

Cuddle Time : When couples first start dating, cuddling is usually a part of their everyday existence.

Make the Women Feel Good : Just like men, woman love feeling good about themselves.

Showing Love : Although hearing the words, I love you is special and important.

Realistic Expectations : No matter how wonderful and flawless your mate seems, no one is perfect.

Go on a Date : Especially for married couples, but even for some dating couples, start dating.

Control Your Anger : Every relationship has difficulties, and sometimes, there can be some intense arguments.

I Forgive You : If something has happened in your relationship causing the trust to waiver, you will have many things to work through.

Day at the Movies : Have a movie marathon some rainy or cold Saturday.

Dinner by the Fire : Order in some of your favorite food, open a bottle of fine wine, light some candles.

A Day at the Spa : Show your appreciation for the hard work that takes.

Keep in Touch : It is important that you keep in touch with each other often.

Motivate Each Other : Find a mutual incentive that will motivate both of you.

Adore your Mate : Appreciate and love them for the person they are.

Make Eye Contact : Think back to the first time you saw your now mate.

Respect Privacy : When two people come together in a relationship, each person has their own set of history.

Be Flexible : There will be times when your mate is right and times when you are right.

Encourage Friendships : Men, unlike women, have a more difficult time in developing close friendships with other men.

christian dating


 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Site Meter

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!