<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Thursday, May 12, 2005

Terrance responds 
Terrance takes me to task again here.

The links will establish how factually grounded his essay is.

As for “defending democracy in Iraq,” it’s my understanding that there wasn’t anything much to defend against in Iraq before we got there and the insurgents (yeah, Jason, I know how that term irks you) sprang up in our wake. No WMDs, no terrorist ties, etc., and all the other justifications were we given for going into this war. The democracy were were allegedly defending was ours, and it turns out it wasn’t in any danger from Iraq or Hussein. So, time to shift justifications, I guess. Now it’s “defending democracy in Iraq,” not “defending democracy from Iraq.”


Yep. That's what happens when you free 25 million people and transform the world for the better.

Comments:
The democracy were were allegedly defending was ours...

And the problem with this, is?


...and it turns out it wasn’t in any danger from Iraq or Hussein.

Then how to explain all these DEMOCRATS saying Saddam is an "imminent threat" for the last decade?

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

Were they "lying" to the American people?
 
Hey, excellent website. A great Iraq resource is Deaths in Iraq. It breaks all of the casualties down by age, race, branch of the military, country, etc.
 
hey what a nice site . your blog is great .

regards
cash advance
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Site Meter

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!