Friday, June 11, 2004
Curiouser and Curiouser: More on Reagan and the Cold War
An reader turns me on to a fascinating aspect of the final stages of the geopolitical wrestling match known as the Cold War:
I confess I haven't checked this out independently (today's a busy day for me). But it makes sense.
An even lesser known facet of Reagan's Cold War strategy was implemented early in his first term...'82, I think. Put simply, Reagan set out to substantially reduce the Soviets' income. And the best way to do that, Bill Casey suggested to Reagan, was to depress the price of oil. So Reagan turned to the Saudis.
In a meeting with the Saudi king, Reagan agreed to sell AWACs to the Saudis. He also agreed that the U.S. would defend Saudi borders against invasion. In exchange, the Saudis agreed to defy OPEC limits and vastly increase their oil production. Reagan then browbeat Congress into authorizing the AWACs deal (much to Israel's chagrin). It wasn't long after that that the Saudis started pumping more oil. (At the time, few people noticed the Saudis oil production increase came on the heels of the AWACs sale.) Of course, the glut of oil resulted in a plummeting price.
Since petroleum exports were their chief source of hard currency, the Soviets were faced with a massive loss of income. That was the first punch. The second punch was Reagan's defense build-up. In short, Reagan forced the Soviets to spend money they didn't have. And it destroyed what was left of their economy.
An interesting footnote: Desert Storm was, in large part, a fulfillment of Reagan's promise to defend Saudi borders against invasion. So when critics whine that Desert Storm was just about oil, they are right for the wrong reasons.
I confess I haven't checked this out independently (today's a busy day for me). But it makes sense.
Comments:
http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1970&mode=thread&order=0
''Was Reagan responsible for the Soviet Union's downfall?''
Printed on Monday, June 07, 2004 @ 00:05:30 CDT ( )
By William Blum
Author of Killing Hope, Rogue State, and West-Bloc Dissident
YellowTimes.org Guest Columnist (United States)
(YellowTimes.org) -- It has become conventional wisdom that it was the relentlessly tough anti-communist policies of the Reagan Administration, with its heated-up arms race, that led to the collapse and reformation of the Soviet Union and its satellites. American history books may have already begun to chisel this thesis into marble. The Tories in Great Britain say that Margaret Thatcher and her unflinching policies contributed to the miracle as well. The East Germans were believers too. When Ronald Reagan visited East Berlin, the people there cheered him and thanked him "for his role in liberating the East". Even many leftist analysts, particularly those of a conspiracy bent, are believers.
But this view is not universally held; nor should it be.
Long the leading Soviet expert on the United States, Georgi Arbatov, head of the Moscow-based Institute for the Study of the U.S.A. and Canada, wrote his memoirs in 1992. A Los Angeles Times book review by Robert Scheer summed up a portion of it:
Arbatov understood all too well the failings of Soviet totalitarianism in comparison to the economy and politics of the West. It is clear from this candid and nuanced memoir that the movement for change had been developing steadily inside the highest corridors of power ever since the death of Stalin. Arbatov not only provides considerable evidence for the controversial notion that this change would have come about without foreign pressure, he insists that the U.S. military buildup during the Reagan years actually impeded this development.
George F. Kennan agrees. The former U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union, and father of the theory of "containment" of the same country, asserts that "the suggestion that any United States administration had the power to influence decisively the course of a tremendous domestic political upheaval in another great country on another side of the globe is simply childish." He contends that the extreme militarization of American policy strengthened hard-liners in the Soviet Union. "Thus the general effect of Cold War extremism was to delay rather than hasten the great change that overtook the Soviet Union."
Though the arms-race spending undoubtedly damaged the fabric of the Soviet civilian economy and society even more than it did in the United States, this had been going on for 40 years by the time Mikhail Gorbachev came to power without the slightest hint of impending doom. Gorbachev's close adviser, Aleksandr Yakovlev, when asked whether the Reagan administration's higher military spending, combined with its "Evil Empire" rhetoric, forced the Soviet Union into a more conciliatory position, responded:
It played no role. None. I can tell you that with the fullest responsibility. Gorbachev and I were ready for changes in our policy regardless of whether the American president was Reagan, or Kennedy, or someone even more liberal. It was clear that our military spending was enormous and we had to reduce it.
Understandably, some Russians might be reluctant to admit that they were forced to make revolutionary changes by their arch enemy, to admit that they lost the Cold War. However, on this question we don't have to rely on the opinion of any individual, Russian or American. We merely have to look at the historical facts.
From the late 1940s to around the mid-1960s, it was an American policy objective to instigate the downfall of the Soviet government as well as several Eastern European regimes. Many hundreds of Russian exiles were organized, trained and equipped by the CIA, then sneaked back into their homeland to set up espionage rings, to stir up armed political struggle, and to carry out acts of assassination and sabotage, such as derailing trains, wrecking bridges, damaging arms factories and power plants, and so on. The Soviet government, which captured many of these men, was of course fully aware of who was behind all this.
Compared to this policy, that of the Reagan administration could be categorized as one of virtual capitulation. Yet what were the fruits of this ultra-tough anti-communist policy? Repeated serious confrontations between the United States and the Soviet Union in Berlin, Cuba and elsewhere, the Soviet interventions into Hungary and Czechoslovakia, creation of the Warsaw Pact (in direct reaction to NATO), no glasnost, no perestroika, only pervasive suspicion, cynicism and hostility on both sides. It turned out that the Russians were human after all -- they responded to toughness with toughness. And the corollary: there was for many years a close correlation between the amicability of U.S.-Soviet relations and the number of Jews allowed to emigrate from the Soviet Union. Softness produced softness.
If there's anyone to attribute the changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to, both the beneficial ones and those questionable, it is of course Mikhail Gorbachev and the activists he inspired. It should be remembered that Reagan was in office for over four years before Gorbachev came to power, and Thatcher for six years, but in that period of time nothing of any significance in the way of Soviet reform took place despite Reagan's and Thatcher's unremitting malice toward the communist state.
[William Blum formerly worked with the State Department. He is the author of three books: Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, Rogue State: a guide to the World's Only Super Power, and West-Bloc Dissident: a Cold War Political Memoir. A signed and personalized copy of each book can be purchased from YellowTimes.org's gifts section.]
YellowTimes.org is an international news and opinion publication. YellowTimes.org encourages its material to be reproduced, reprinted, or broadcast provided that any such reproduction identifies the original source, http://www.YellowTimes.org. Internet web links to http://www.YellowTimes.org are appreciated.
''Was Reagan responsible for the Soviet Union's downfall?''
Printed on Monday, June 07, 2004 @ 00:05:30 CDT ( )
By William Blum
Author of Killing Hope, Rogue State, and West-Bloc Dissident
YellowTimes.org Guest Columnist (United States)
(YellowTimes.org) -- It has become conventional wisdom that it was the relentlessly tough anti-communist policies of the Reagan Administration, with its heated-up arms race, that led to the collapse and reformation of the Soviet Union and its satellites. American history books may have already begun to chisel this thesis into marble. The Tories in Great Britain say that Margaret Thatcher and her unflinching policies contributed to the miracle as well. The East Germans were believers too. When Ronald Reagan visited East Berlin, the people there cheered him and thanked him "for his role in liberating the East". Even many leftist analysts, particularly those of a conspiracy bent, are believers.
But this view is not universally held; nor should it be.
Long the leading Soviet expert on the United States, Georgi Arbatov, head of the Moscow-based Institute for the Study of the U.S.A. and Canada, wrote his memoirs in 1992. A Los Angeles Times book review by Robert Scheer summed up a portion of it:
Arbatov understood all too well the failings of Soviet totalitarianism in comparison to the economy and politics of the West. It is clear from this candid and nuanced memoir that the movement for change had been developing steadily inside the highest corridors of power ever since the death of Stalin. Arbatov not only provides considerable evidence for the controversial notion that this change would have come about without foreign pressure, he insists that the U.S. military buildup during the Reagan years actually impeded this development.
George F. Kennan agrees. The former U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union, and father of the theory of "containment" of the same country, asserts that "the suggestion that any United States administration had the power to influence decisively the course of a tremendous domestic political upheaval in another great country on another side of the globe is simply childish." He contends that the extreme militarization of American policy strengthened hard-liners in the Soviet Union. "Thus the general effect of Cold War extremism was to delay rather than hasten the great change that overtook the Soviet Union."
Though the arms-race spending undoubtedly damaged the fabric of the Soviet civilian economy and society even more than it did in the United States, this had been going on for 40 years by the time Mikhail Gorbachev came to power without the slightest hint of impending doom. Gorbachev's close adviser, Aleksandr Yakovlev, when asked whether the Reagan administration's higher military spending, combined with its "Evil Empire" rhetoric, forced the Soviet Union into a more conciliatory position, responded:
It played no role. None. I can tell you that with the fullest responsibility. Gorbachev and I were ready for changes in our policy regardless of whether the American president was Reagan, or Kennedy, or someone even more liberal. It was clear that our military spending was enormous and we had to reduce it.
Understandably, some Russians might be reluctant to admit that they were forced to make revolutionary changes by their arch enemy, to admit that they lost the Cold War. However, on this question we don't have to rely on the opinion of any individual, Russian or American. We merely have to look at the historical facts.
From the late 1940s to around the mid-1960s, it was an American policy objective to instigate the downfall of the Soviet government as well as several Eastern European regimes. Many hundreds of Russian exiles were organized, trained and equipped by the CIA, then sneaked back into their homeland to set up espionage rings, to stir up armed political struggle, and to carry out acts of assassination and sabotage, such as derailing trains, wrecking bridges, damaging arms factories and power plants, and so on. The Soviet government, which captured many of these men, was of course fully aware of who was behind all this.
Compared to this policy, that of the Reagan administration could be categorized as one of virtual capitulation. Yet what were the fruits of this ultra-tough anti-communist policy? Repeated serious confrontations between the United States and the Soviet Union in Berlin, Cuba and elsewhere, the Soviet interventions into Hungary and Czechoslovakia, creation of the Warsaw Pact (in direct reaction to NATO), no glasnost, no perestroika, only pervasive suspicion, cynicism and hostility on both sides. It turned out that the Russians were human after all -- they responded to toughness with toughness. And the corollary: there was for many years a close correlation between the amicability of U.S.-Soviet relations and the number of Jews allowed to emigrate from the Soviet Union. Softness produced softness.
If there's anyone to attribute the changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to, both the beneficial ones and those questionable, it is of course Mikhail Gorbachev and the activists he inspired. It should be remembered that Reagan was in office for over four years before Gorbachev came to power, and Thatcher for six years, but in that period of time nothing of any significance in the way of Soviet reform took place despite Reagan's and Thatcher's unremitting malice toward the communist state.
[William Blum formerly worked with the State Department. He is the author of three books: Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, Rogue State: a guide to the World's Only Super Power, and West-Bloc Dissident: a Cold War Political Memoir. A signed and personalized copy of each book can be purchased from YellowTimes.org's gifts section.]
YellowTimes.org is an international news and opinion publication. YellowTimes.org encourages its material to be reproduced, reprinted, or broadcast provided that any such reproduction identifies the original source, http://www.YellowTimes.org. Internet web links to http://www.YellowTimes.org are appreciated.
business web hosting Web Hosting Ecommerce Your source for the latest in the business web hosting industry, News, links and latest business web hosting developments.
I with no reasonable doubt say that the info you provided above was right to the point as we all know it future forex trading can be very challenging and thus we should applaus to those that put in wore to provide us with all needed ideals and infomation. My self i`m very thankfull. You can get more ideals and info from my website future forex trading
If content is King, then surely relevence is Queen.
Link to this site: seo web site design
http://seo-faq.info/
Link to this site: seo web site design
http://seo-faq.info/
I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
How your habits control your small business sucess.
Link to this site: small home business opportunity
http://small-businesses.info/
Link to this site: small home business opportunity
http://small-businesses.info/
I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
Hi was doing my weekly blog searches and found yours. It looks very nice I wish you much luck with it. I have a website that offers software with private label rights you can get a free membership there.
How Ya doing Hope your having a good day. Your blog is most interesting. I was looking for online dating for men related stuff when i came across it. thanks for the read. I have a site that may interest you come and visit sometime, online dating for menthanks again.
Here it is... FREE advertising, FREE download. No cost to you! Get your FREE download NOW! Make money and get FREE advertising! This is a great program for the new year... Check this out now for FREE!
To find out more visit: workfromhome site. It successfully exposes FREE information covering traffic and workfromhome related stuff. Don't forget, FREE, FREE, FREE!!!
To find out more visit: workfromhome site. It successfully exposes FREE information covering traffic and workfromhome related stuff. Don't forget, FREE, FREE, FREE!!!
Hi,
I am able to read and find the info I require thank to your blog. It is very well written and also very useful.
Regards,
make extra money
I am able to read and find the info I require thank to your blog. It is very well written and also very useful.
Regards,
make extra money
Hey Blogger,
Where can I find out more information about this topic on your webpage? I really thought it was great and would like to see more!
Regards,
fast money make online
Where can I find out more information about this topic on your webpage? I really thought it was great and would like to see more!
Regards,
fast money make online
Hello,
Just a note to say that I have found the details on your site, very interesting. There are a few ideas I would like to use on my site too. Thanks for your help in this matter.
Thanks,
business online start
Just a note to say that I have found the details on your site, very interesting. There are a few ideas I would like to use on my site too. Thanks for your help in this matter.
Thanks,
business online start
Hi Blogger:)
We had a very great time reading this web blog.. It is well written and very up to date.. Thank U..
Regards,
at work make home money
We had a very great time reading this web blog.. It is well written and very up to date.. Thank U..
Regards,
at work make home money
Good comments. But, I do not agree with most of them. People sure have a lot of time on their hands.
Hi Blogger:)
We had a very great time reading this web blog.. It is well written and very up to date.. Thank U..
Regards,
money home work make at
We had a very great time reading this web blog.. It is well written and very up to date.. Thank U..
Regards,
money home work make at
I appreciate the time you have taken on your blog, thank you for the nice read.
Regards,
work from home company
Regards,
work from home company
Hello. I was blog surfing and your blog caught my eye. I have a cool site that may interest you. If your not interested, then I am sorry for bothering you. Go to online marketing.
Hi blogger:)
We shall inform all my school friends about this web blog...... they were searching for the same info a couple of days/weeks ago.. If they still need that info they will adore Ur web blog:)
Regards,
online start business
We shall inform all my school friends about this web blog...... they were searching for the same info a couple of days/weeks ago.. If they still need that info they will adore Ur web blog:)
Regards,
online start business
I really liked your blog because it's a great way to learn more about trading. You've nailed it with your post. I had been googling for stuff on top network marketing companies and while searching Blogspot I came across your post on your blog. I try to keep to Forex Trading but that's not always possible. It is reasonable because there is seldom a single solution in our business. With regrards to your post I realize I've got a few things to learn yet. Keep up the good work!
Good comments. But, I do not agree with most of them. People sure have a lot of time on their hands.
Chemical dependency is a devastating disease that affects millions of individuals and families. Find the right alcohol rehabilitation program for yourself or a loved. It will be the first day of the rest of their or your life.
You can get more assistance at www.darnweb.com .
You can get more assistance at www.darnweb.com .
Greetings!A friend of mine told me about your blog, and I must say that it is as good as he says. Keep up the good work.
Regards,
web master affiliate program
Regards,
web master affiliate program
Hi Blogger,
I hope you keep updating your blog. It is already amazing, and I have lots to read... but wish to keep it as my future toy:)
Regards,
delete spyware
I hope you keep updating your blog. It is already amazing, and I have lots to read... but wish to keep it as my future toy:)
Regards,
delete spyware
Giving a estate jewelry to someone you care about is a message of caring. There are so many great local resources now for estate jewelry . It is easier than ever to pick up the phone or go online and find estate jewelry.
Another great site with a lot of updating information is http://www.aphroditesaccessories.com. Thanks by the way for such a great blog!
Another great site with a lot of updating information is http://www.aphroditesaccessories.com. Thanks by the way for such a great blog!
Best games to play, best strategies to win. User ratings & reviews of top online casinos & pokers with largest bonuses & highest payouts.
Post a Comment



