Sunday, March 07, 2004
Army Times Watch Update:
Rereading the email, I can find no evidence that it was the marketing department, and not the editorial department, that responded to the reader's comment below. I regret the error.
Further, after perusing the Army Times' search archives (using "First Command" and 'finance' as the search terms), I can find no evidence that the Army Times has ever done a focused piece on First Command at all.
They did publish one letter from a First Command public relations representative, but that's all.
Here's what I'd like to see:
A feature article: "USAA Vs. First Command--Who's Better?"
Whoever does it ought to know how to read a prospectus and ferret out hidden fees and streams of income, and continue the comparison from mutual funds to annuities to insurance to college planning to 'wrap' fee structures. Get under the hood!
Who benefits?
Soldiers and their families.
Splash, out
Jason
Further, after perusing the Army Times' search archives (using "First Command" and 'finance' as the search terms), I can find no evidence that the Army Times has ever done a focused piece on First Command at all.
They did publish one letter from a First Command public relations representative, but that's all.
Here's what I'd like to see:
A feature article: "USAA Vs. First Command--Who's Better?"
Whoever does it ought to know how to read a prospectus and ferret out hidden fees and streams of income, and continue the comparison from mutual funds to annuities to insurance to college planning to 'wrap' fee structures. Get under the hood!
Who benefits?
Soldiers and their families.
Splash, out
Jason
Comments:
Post a Comment
