<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Murphy's a M*********r. 
From the New York Times:

The morning Hurricane Katrina thundered ashore, Louisiana National Guard commanders thought they were prepared to save their state. But when 15-foot floodwaters swept into their headquarters, cut their communications and disabled their high-water trucks, they had their hands full just saving themselves.


Ooh, yeah. Let's preposition even more supplies in the storm area right away!


For a crucial 24 hours after landfall on Aug. 29, Guard officers said, they were preoccupied with protecting their nerve center from the waves topping the windows at Jackson Barracks and rescuing soldiers who could not swim. The next morning, they had to evacuate their entire headquarters force of 375 guardsmen by boat and helicopter to the Superdome.


Not sure I trust the timeline here. The levees I understand didn't break until the next day. Love the dangling participle, though. How many soldiers did the window-topping waves rescue?


It was an inauspicious start to the National Guard response to the storm, which ultimately fell so short that it has set off a national debate about whether the Pentagon should take charge immediately after catastrophes. President Bush has asked Congress to study the question, and top Defense Department and Guard officials are scheduled to testify on the response before a House panel on Wednesday.


No, the federal government should not take charge immediately after catastrophes. Actually, that doesn't even seem to be a matter of serious debate among military people I know. I mean, why turn the concept of federalism on its head and micromanage every little storm from Washington when it's far simpler NOT TO PUT YOUR HEADQUARTERS IN A FLOOD ZONE IN A CITY VULNERABLE TO FLOODING!

In interviews, Guard commanders and state and local officials in Louisiana said the Guard performed well under the circumstances. But they say it was crippled in the early days by a severe shortage of troops that they blame in part on the deployment to Iraq of 3,200 Louisiana guardsmen. While the Pentagon disputes that Iraq was a factor, those on the ground say the war has clearly strained a force intended to be the nation's bulwark against natural disasters and terrorist attacks.


You know, the New York Times ought to do a bit more homework and exercize a bit more common sense before they start yapping about what the Guard is intended for.

The National Guard is intended to temporarily supplement the regular army as it fights and wins our nation's wars. It has always been that way. People who think that the Guard is not supposed to be a deployable, battle-ready force need to get that idiocy out of their minds.

I mean, what the hell am I doing with a mortar platoon? What's with those hundreds and hundreds of M1 tanks in the inventory? What am I going to do with those Mk 19 40mm automatic grenade launchers in my supply room?

The National Guard spends 11 months out of every year training to close with and destroy the enemy in the field, or support the effort of others to do the same. The Guard spends one month of every year on its state mission.

Yes, the nation does not need us all the time. Meanwhile, the governors can make effective use of the guard for local and home defense and missions in support of civil authorities. But when the ignoramuses at the Times try to play down the primacy of the federal mission, I'm here to crush that idea.

By spreading this meme, the Times is insulting the Guard and its soldiers.

Yet the very effectiveness of the eventual military response - which climbed to 35,000 guardsmen and active-duty troops - only underscored questions that will long haunt Louisiana guard officials: Should commanders have moved their headquarters to higher ground before the storm?


Does the Pope wear a funny hat?

Check out the whole thing, though.

My favorite part: The article chastises the LA Guard for not confronting the crowd at the Superdome:

At the convention center, 222 soldiers trained in levee repair, not police work, locked themselves into an exhibit hall at the convention center rather than challenge an angry and desperate crowd of more than 10,000 hurricane victims at the center.


So why is it we have to wait until the very end of the article, a dozen paragraphs later, before we learn that many of the troops didn't even have weapons?

Don't you think the Times owes the officers and men involved at least that much consideration? What the f*ck, over?!?!?

Did the Times have a better idea? Would it have been better to capitulate? What happens when the crowd moves to seize their weapons, too? You'd have a massacre on your hands.

As far as I can tell, the Colonel's decision was reasonable and prudent under the circumstances. And those men sure as shit don't need to get slimed by a couple of halfwit reporters who weren't at the scene and who clearly have no idea what is involved in a use-of-force decision.

Splash, out

Jason

Comments:
It was an inauspicious start to the National Guard response to the storm, which ultimately fell so short that it has set off a national debate about whether the Pentagon should take charge immediately after catastrophes. President Bush has asked Congress to study the question, and top Defense Department and Guard officials are scheduled to testify on the response before a House panel on Wednesday.

WRONG. Even if you buy the MSM's story that the response was bungled/late, that story so far has been that it was FEMA's "inauspicious start" that has led to calls for the military to take over. If the military response initially sucked, as this article seems to claim, then why would everyone be calling for them to take over the whole show? I guess conservatives who have been calling for a stronger miltiary role would argue that the failure of teh state/local response is what indicates that the military should be in charge from now on. In either case, though, it makes no sense to claim that the miltiary screwed up and should therefore now be in charge. The Times needs to get their story straight.

There's only one way that this story makes a little (not a lot) more sense. The Times and the rest of the MSM still equate the Guard with Bush, nevermind the facts. Guard = military = federal = Bush.

Overall, however, the big picture story that we are getting makes no sense, and makes even less sense after this article. The story from teh left has been this: The response, which is totally a fedreal responsibility (read Bush), was a disaster, so we should consider ammending the law to allow the president we hate to unilaterally declare emergengies and send active-duty troops with weapons into our towns. And, oh by the way, the miltiary was incompetent too, which is another reason why they should be in charge, led by the guy we hate.

The leftwing MSM can't keep their story straight, and even when they can, it makes no sense whatsoever!

Jason, keep up the good work.
 
I always check the place over here ford logo
 
Good post
 
Hey, I go to see you blog everyday and you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a travel agent site/blog. It pretty much covers ##KEYWORD## related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time mate :-)
 
Hey great blog, I totally agree with some of your comments. I just put up a new site on deal last minute travel
 
Great blog post.

I thought your readers would like to see this site as well:
geico car insurance or check out http://www.officialautoinsurancedeal.com for geico car insurance info.
 
Hi , I was out blog surfing looking for some info on online dating louisville when I ended up on your page. Should you ever need it, you can get specific information about online dating louisville at the site above.
 
A real enlightening blog. Don't stop now. Don't miss visiting this site about debt consolidation refinance http://thehomemortgageguide.com STOP renting now, Find out how! debt consolidation refinance
 
Shop online today. Forget driving to the mall when you can just click the mouse and order from your favorite store. No traffic to deal with
 
I was surfing and found you. Ever wonder about who came up with the term "surfing"? The wave of the Internet. Back to looking for cheap computers and stuff. Have a good one.
 
start earning money 15 minutes from now
 
Your 'MALL OF THE WORLD!' money making system features a vast selection of the same products you'll find in some of the BIGGEST and most successful retail stores!
 
Hi Blogger your blog is really great! Wow :-) As I was out blog surfing and surfing the web for detailed info on ohio home owner insurance I stumbled across your blog. Obviously my search landed me here and it is a little off subject compared to this post, but I am certainly glad I did come across your blog. Did I already tell you I like it! If you would not mind, I would like to add your link to my "favorites" page to come back and read again sometime. Should you ever need it, there's lots of information on this site about ohio home owner insurance . Again, great blog and keep up the great work!
 
Data recovery is big business in todays way of life, DON'T BE CAUGHT OUT.
Link to my site: linux data recovery software
 
a great opportunity, no selling, no phoning, no recruiting PERIOD!
 
Hello,

I found this web site useful I can safely say I will be back again before you can say Jack Robinson!

Regards,
adware spyware removal
 
Murphy's law is an adage in Western culture that broadly states that things will go wrong in any given situation, if you give them a chance. "If there's more than one possible outcome of a job or task, and one of those outcomes will result in disaster or an undesirable consequence, then somebody will do it that way. sportsbook " It is most often cited as "Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong" (or, alternately, "Whatever can go wrong will go wrong, and at the worst possible time, in the worst possible way" or, "Anything that can go wrong, will," or "If anything can go wrong, it will, and usually at the most inopportune moment"). The saying is sometimes referred to as Sod's law or Finagle's law which can also be rendered as "Anything that can go wrong, will—at the worst possible moment". http://www.enterbet.com
 
This comment has been removed by the author.
 
The authorities began to investigate the possible routes of the hurricane warning for the people of the seriousness of the situation and issuing an order in principle voluntary evacuation, which ended up being mandatory.costa rica fishing
Evacuate an entire city, carries his time. Most people, oblivious to the real danger was coming,had postponed his departure until the last minute. When Katrina reached Category 5 and threatened to come ashore for a class of about 5, had only a few days for its arrival and the mass population, decided to leave the city. http://www.fishingcostaricaexperts.com
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Site Meter

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!