<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Saturday, September 18, 2004

Slate's Condescention Toward Military Galls 
Liberals are very much up in arms at John Kerry's cool reception at the National Guard Officer's Association conference in Las Vegas. They're pulling their hair out! And of course, they're blaming it upon us Guard officers, who must be naive, stupid, and hoodwinked.

It's amazing how often liberal rhetoric predicates the ignorance of the American people.

At any rate, here's Slate's William Saletan, looking down his nose at us poor guardsmen even as he displays the rankest ignorance regarding the history and role of the National Guard.

The Guard's primary purpose has traditionally been homeland security.


Wrong. That is only true of our state missions. But most units only spend one assembly out of twelve training for their state missions. The fact is that the majority of combat units in the Army are in the National Guard.

I'm not talking truck drivers. Support units are more common in the Reserves. I'm talking about killers: infantry. Armor. Artillery. What in the world is a battalion of 155mm guns or MLRS rockets going to do for homeland security?

Guard units are trained and organized to fight with an armed enemy on the battlefield. Homeland security has never been the primary focus of national guardsmen.

Indeed, thousands of National Guard units--entire divisions--were called up for the Spanish American War and the 1st world war. The 29th Infantry Division--a guard division out of Virginia and Maryland still in existence today, hit the beaches of Normandy on D-Day. The 35th Infantry Division took more than 100% casualties as part of Patton's 3rd Army. The 100th/442nd RCT, the most decorated unit of its size in WWII, was largely a derivative of Hawaii national guard formations. And the 298th and 299th Infantry Regiments, Hawaii National Guard, served in the south pacific campaign under MacArthur, alongside my own 124th Infantry Regiment, which was in the New Guinea campaign.

The 40th Infantry Division was mobilized and deployed into the combat zone during the Korean War. And the 29th Infantry Brigade (separate) was mobilized for Viet Nam in 1968, although its soldiers did not fight as a unit, but were sent over as individual replacements.

Most of the infantry formations in the Army are in the National Guard. Traditionally, the infantry is not about homeland security. The infantry closes with and destroys the enemy in close combat. Saletan doesn't know what he's talking about.

But these Guard troops aren't being sent to fight the people who attacked the United States in September 2001. They're being sent to—and locked in—Iraq.


I'm getting pretty tired of this straw man. Nobody ever claimed that Iraq attacked the US in September 2001. We weren't worried about what happened in September 2001. We were worried about what might happen in September 2008, if Iraq had WMDs or slipped WMD technology to Al Qaeda. I guess that's a risk Saletan thinks he can afford to lose, though I have no idea why.

What does Iraq have to do with the "national emergency" declared by Bush in 2001? Nothing. The 9/11 commission found "no evidence" of "a collaborative operational relationship" between Iraq and al-Qaida. Four days ago, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell reaffirmed, "I have no indication that there was a direct connection between the terrorists who perpetrated these crimes against us on the 11th of September, 2001, and the Iraqi regime."


Saletan misrepresents the findings of the commission. The commission found that Iraq and Al Qaeda were, indeed, cooperating on weapons development and procurement. True, it had nothing to do, directly, with September 2001. Neither did Nazi Germany, but we still went after them, too.

This insistence that every target of US Arms somehow be tied directly to 9/11 is beyond stupid.

In short, Bush has pulled Guard troops away from their homeland security duties to fight and die in a war unrelated to the service for which they enlisted.


Bullshit, as I've established. For example, all infantrymen--Guard or Active Duty--volunteered for the infantry. For Saletan to argue that service abroad against an armed enemy is not what a Guard infantryman signed up to be ready for is an insult and an affront to all our National Guard soldiers.

A guardsman who did less than he signed up for is coercing other guardsmen to do more than they signed up for.


Perhaps. It depends on the MOS. Take George W. Bush for example. His aircraft did not have a mission in Viet Nam, and was being phased out of service. So, just who, exactly, had to do more???? I'd like a name, please, or a duty position. I'm calling the bluff of this stupid arguement. Who, precisely had to go to Viet Nam because Bush didn't serve in Alabama?

And even if we take Saletan's postulate as true--a postulate he has no business makeing, then how can he admiringly refer to this guy in the next paragraph:

One guardsman is doing something about it. After serving nine years in the Marines and the Army, including combat duty in Iraq, he enlisted last fall in the Guard. The bait he swallowed was the "Try One" program, which supposedly lets veterans sample a year of Guard service before making a longer commitment. Two months ago, invoking its "stop-loss" policy, the Army called up the guardsman's unit for duty in Iraq and changed his one-year commitment to three years. He sued to void the policy, noting that its application to Iraq "bears no relation to the threat of terrorism against the United States."


Now, here's a clear cut case. If this soldier doesn't go, his unit will deploy anyway. And some other schmuck with the relevant MOS and rank will get called involuntarily from another unit or from the IRR and go in his place. That's how the mobilization system works. That doesn't seem to have occured to Saletan.

Most Guard officers, however, refuse to admit that their institution is being abused. They gave Bush standing ovations on Tuesday when he told them that "you're fighting terrorist enemies in Iraq" and that the war was "necessary to defend America."


Saletan hasn't established that the Guard is being abused. There are problems, yes, primarily with personnel and procurement. The integration of large numbers of reserve component troops into the campaign has been rocky. But Saletan doesn't have the familiarity with the military to articulate this case.

Simply deploying a combat, combat support, or a combat service support to a combat theatre is NOT abusing the guard. Saletan is too clueless to realize this, but a lot of Guard officers were ticked off about being underused in the first Gulf War, and distrusted the motivations of the Regular Army, whom they felt were working to keep the guard off of the battlefield, in order to protect their own budgets down the road. Back to Saletan:

Those brave, loyal, hoodwinked guardsmen. They think Bush is one of them. They don't understand that the only presidential candidate who's done the job they're doing now—risking life and shedding blood—is the guy on the other side.


I find Saletan's condescending attitude towards Guard officers --a conceitedness all too common on the left--to be particularly galling. Saletan, Let me know when you're ready to stop looking down your nose at us. I'll then remind you that we're not stupid, many of us are combat veterans now ourselves, and we can make our own assessments of both candidates, thank you.

Splash, out

Jason




Comments:
I've been in a number of serious discussions with my lefty friends (I work at a University), and they can never understand why the military often doesn't think too highly of Kerry. I've taken to explaining from a proper jihadist perspective.

Clinton was an infidel with regards to the military. An outsider, to be tolerated mostly. Bush wasn't an infidel by any means, but he wasn't in the inner circle either being a stateside guardsman. He at a minimum followed the medical profession's dictum, "do no harm."

Kerry, after the Winter Soldier episode and his anti-war activities, is an apostate. A fallen member of the brotherhood. And anyone who studies close knits groups (Mormons, Naval Aviators, Muslims, Red Sox fans, etc.)knows that apostacy is the far greater crime. Hell have no wrath greater...

The left just doesn't seem to get it. They get a glimmer, though, when you ask them how they feel about Zell Miller. Smile when you ask.
 
we're listening......tell me about how great the chimp is?
 
I found your blog on hair loss organin and thought it might be of interest to my readers at hair loss organinmy site. Check it out if you have time.
 
Get 1000s of Links pointing back to Your Site... Starting Today!
 
Think that will drive you some extra traffic?
 
I have found a site that has information on travel germany ,travel germany, and travel germany . You may find it very useful at travel germany
 
I really enjoyed reading your Blog about business home investment making money. I also have a Blog/Website about business home investment making money come check it out!! Have a great day!
 
##Deadeasy##
 
Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a circus circus las vegas site/blog. It pretty much covers ##KEYWORD## related stuff.

Come and check it out if you have time :-)
 
Good evening Blogger, I find it very refreshing to occasionally find a post such as yours with a related topic such as this post. It somehow ads to ones list of lifes experiences.

I have a soft spot for blogs related to ebook demo and /or sites that have a central theme around ebook demo type items.

Once again, thank you Blogger, keep up the unusual posts. :-)
 
Hi Blogger, I find it very refreshing to occasionally find a article such as yours with a familiar topic such as this post. It somehow ads to ones list of lifes experiences.

I have a soft spot for blogs related to publishing software and /or sites that have a central theme around publishing software type items.

Once again, thank you Blogger, hope to see more posts from you in the future :-)
 
Hello Blogger, I find it very refreshing to occasionally find a post such as yours with a similar topic to what I was looking for. It often ads to ones list of lifes experiences.

I tend to have a soft spot for blogs related to tutorial writing and /or sites that have a central theme around tutorial writing type items.

Once again, thank you, hope you don't mind if I visit again sometime :-)
 
Good Morning Blogger, I find reading blog articles like this post most rewarding at times. It enhances the experiences of life in many cases.

Being a physician, amongst other things I often have a soft spot for blogs related to publishing software and /or sites that are built around publishing software type items.

Once again, thank you Blogger, and I will look for your posts again in the future. :-)
 
Check out Internet Marketing Christmas, this special ends on 12/21/2005
 
I was out searching for some mens dating related information when I landed on your page. you have some good stuff here. your blog wasn't exactly what I was looking for i enjoyed the read, thanks. I'll continue on looking for mens dating, see you again sometime.
 
Weet u ongeveer wat al hype is?Candidly, Lashanda septoplasty operation
 
Ik bracht een tijdje door denkend over het, en ik heb een paar meer vragen.Salaam, Ena lafayette plastic surgery
 
Ik veronderstel dat wanneer het over dessert reception, verschillende mensen komt verschillende behoeften hebben.Sincerely, Nguyet dessert reception
 
Hi,

My brother likes blogging, and we soon start our own web blog

We wish and hope to create a similar web blog like this one...

Keep it up!

Regards,
make easy money online
 
Keep up the good work! I�ve been looking for photo personals online and I found this site - http://top-personals.net. It�s amazing that you can find swinger site and so many picture personal ads from your area there.
 
"Neither did Nazi Germany but we went after them too".

Why don't you try actually reading a little about your subject matter before showcasing your ignorance with a statement like that? If you had bothered to read, you would have noticed that a few days after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, Nazi Germany declared war upon America. So of course Roosevelt reciprocated the declaration you imbecile. You make it sound like after Pearl Harbor the U.S. just went after Germany because they were an ally of Japan, which most certainly would NOT have happened had Germany not declared war on America, instead America would have fought Japan and remained an Allied-leaning neutral in the fight against Germany. But I guess reading might be asking a bit too much of a brainwashed warmonger with his head firmly wedged up George Bush's ass.
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Site Meter

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!

Prev | List | Random | Next
Powered by RingSurf!